The Duff CEO with a Windows-Logo on his forehead: “Gamers use Windows because of its’ user experience not our de facto monopoly.”

Next Image: Duff CEO with Windows-Logo in front of a “Out of Business” sign. Subtitle: “30 minutes after SteamOS is released”

Edit: Yo, I’m not saying this is gonna happen. I just want to say that Windew’s UX sucks ass.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Requisite “you don’t need to wait for SteamOS” post.

    Gamed on Linux for over 2 years. The time is now. Shit just works (mostly).

    Edit: and yes, you can often get better performance on the same games with the same hardware.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      Shit just works (mostly).

      That’s the “damning with faint praise” that has been the bane of Linux since slackware came on 500 floppies.

      Sometimes that “mostly” is just “oh, you have to do this simple thing that is in a FAQ once and then you’re golden”. Other times it’s “oh, that hardware isn’t supported, so I guess you don’t have a usable video card”.

      I think what many of us are hoping with when it comes to SteamOS is that a few of the remaining really sharp edges get sanded off. And, just maybe, there will be a tipping point where the smoother the experience, the more people use it, and the more people use it, the smoother the experience will be.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        Frankly I just shouldn’t have put the mostly. I’ve literally had one issue in the last year. Point is: just try it.

          • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 minutes ago

            I’ve primarily been using PopOS, which has been fantastically stable and very easy. I have an all AMD system, but my understanding is that the nvidia version of Pop also makes some of the nvidia driver stuff a lot easier.

            I also play on Arch sometimes, but realistically you probably don’t want bleeding edge stuff if the point is just making sure games work. That’s where the relative stability of something like Pop / Mint / even just pure Debian comes into play.

    • endeavor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Same experience here. People waiting for steamos don’t know most good distros work how they think steamos is gonna. Games with kernel level anti cheat that are worth playing are few and far between. And fuck their communities for not rioting when their fellow members get removed from the game for no reason.

    • MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      My whole family largely uses Linux as our daily driver - ages - 40, 38, 18, 9, 7

      The only one not running Linux is my 38 year old wife.

      HOWEVER - my 9 year old got an occulus for Xmas, and suddenly we are dual booting and that’s a real shame.

    • Amon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      you can often get better performance on the same games with the same hardware.

      Because there’s a reason why Linux does not randomly use the disk like Windows does

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Back when I was still on an HDD the difference between NTFS and ext4 was night and day.

        I remember having the need to defragment my drive on windows every few months, or Batman Arkham Asylum would actually start to lag and stutter trying to load textures.

        Meanwhile World of Warships, another texture heavy game, would load significantly faster when I tried it on Linux because surprise surpsise, ext4 doesn’t fragment until your disk is nearly full.

        Windows honestly gg ez’d it’s way out of making a newer FS with the advent of SSDs, but there was a period of time where upgrading to Windows 8 would blow up your drive usage to 100% the entire time the PC was on.

        • Amon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          NTFS is imo even worse than exFAT because at least exFAT didn’t eat your disk alive