General_Effort@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 23 hours agoI know just the audience for thislemmy.worldimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down121cross-posted to: nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imageI know just the audience for thislemmy.worldGeneral_Effort@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 23 hours agomessage-square99fedilinkcross-posted to: nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
minus-squareJinni@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·edit-212 hours agoHow dare you correct my high in the morning ass! That being said, I made the edit. I bet it made the comment better.
minus-squareNeilBrü@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·11 hours agoMy sincerest apologies for killing a delectable morning buzz, but my eye twitches due to my slight 'tism when I see the “should/could of” error. It’s not you. It’s me.
minus-squareJinni@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 hours agoNo problem man I understand. I accept your 'tism and hope you having a good day. And if not take a hit 😎
minus-squaretowerful@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·10 hours agoI don’t think you could of handled the correction any better ducks
minus-squarerimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 hours agoI wonder if this is a mistake only native speakers do, because I (as non native speaker) don’t understand why anyone would mistake “of” for “have”.
minus-squareMidnight Wolf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-26 hours agoIt’s because when it’s said aloud, many of us just truncate the “have” ('ve) and it sounds like “of”. Then we go to type it and often type what we think it sounds like…
How dare you correct my high in the morning ass!
That being said, I made the edit. I bet it made the comment better.
My sincerest apologies for killing a delectable morning buzz, but my eye twitches due to my slight 'tism when I see the “should/could of” error.
It’s not you. It’s me.
No problem man I understand. I accept your 'tism and hope you having a good day.
And if not take a hit 😎
This toke’s for you!
I don’t think you could of handled the correction any better
ducks
(Sighs)
ಠ_ಠ *eye twitch intensifies*
I wonder if this is a mistake only native speakers do, because I (as non native speaker) don’t understand why anyone would mistake “of” for “have”.
It’s because when it’s said aloud, many of us just truncate the “have” ('ve) and it sounds like “of”. Then we go to type it and often type what we think it sounds like…