Perhaps the most interesting part of the article:

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    You’d think that insurance companies would be on the forefront of pushing climate change mitigation and prevention specifically because the impacts of worsening climate change will have a massive impact on their bottom line.

    Maybe they can counter some of the petro company propaganda with their own marketing.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Their time preferences have been shortened to “this quarter” just like the rest of the economy. We would need to buy insurance plans that last decades and not renegotiate every year.

      So long as we live in an economy designed to maximize GDP, this can’t work.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      TBH, if insurance companies started pushing for climate change policies it would probably make those policies less popular. If there’s an industry less trusted than Big Oil, it’s Insurance.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Why would they do that rather than just not offering plans in areas where they project they will lose money?

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        They’ll run out of places to sell insurance pretty fast if climate change isn’t effectively countered.

    • TehWorld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      They’re in the business of making money, not fixing problems. It’s easier to just pull out of an unprofitable area than fix the Republican party’s head-in-their-ass ideas about climate change.