Summary

The Supreme Court appears likely to uphold a U.S. law requiring TikTok’s China-based owner, ByteDance, to divest ownership, potentially banning the app.

While TikTok and users argue the law violates First Amendment rights, justices leaned toward national security concerns about China’s access to American user data.

Chief Justice Roberts noted Congress’s findings on ByteDance’s ties to Chinese intelligence.

TikTok argued the law is unprecedented and impacts free speech, but Solicitor General Prelogar downplayed claims of operational shutdown.

A decision is imminent, and political complexities remain, including potential divestiture negotiations.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    Come on TikTok. Just buy the justices some RVs or pay their family’s rents/mortgages. Have you learned nothing?

    • watson
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Isn’t Trump the one who initiated the ban in the first place?

      • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah but he had a very friendly meeting with some TikTok executives and they told him the error of his ways in a manner he couldn’t deny

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Trump already asked them to delay the ban until after he gets into office (politico article source). This might say less about his promises, and more about the Supreme Court not being as much in his pocket as he thinks.