• nthavoc@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The money I spent on my education could have bought the roof, a ton of bootstraps to pull up, but probably not the electricity. :(

      • theonetruejason@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Banks would fucking love this. They would be salivating at the idea that home loans can’t be discharged via bankruptcy.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That was made the case because you can’t repossess an education (yet). I don’t necessarily agree with it but I also don’t actually have a problem with banks not being allowed to seize private homes within certain limitations.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Being that most of the people who didn’t/couldn’t pay their student loans did pay rent… The banks would have gotten their money and many of the people would have equity. I’m not saying there wouldn’t have been defaults, but I get what they meant