• lad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’d say that difference between nature boiling down to maths and LLMs boiling down to maths is that in LLMs it’s not the knowledge itself that is abstracted, it’s language. This makes it both more believable to us humans, because we’re wired to use language, and less suitable to actually achieve something, because it’s just language all the way down.

    Would be nice if it gets us something in the long run, but I wouldn’t keep my hopes up

    • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m super stoked now to follow this and to also follow the progress being made mapping the neurological pathways of the human brain. Wanna say i saw an article on lemmy recently where the mapped the entire network of neurons in either an insect or a mouse, I can’t remember. So I’m guna assume like 3-5 years until we can map out human brains and know exactly what is firing off which brain cells as someone is doing puzzles in real time.

      I think it would be so crazy cool if we get to a pint where the understanding of our cognitive processes is so detailed that scientists are left with nothing but faith as their only way of defining the difference between a computer processing information and a person. Obviously the subsequent dark ages that follow will suck after all people of science snap and revert into becoming idiot priests. But that’s a risk I’m willing to take. 🤣🤣🍻

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Maybe a rat brain project? I think the mapping of human may take longer, but yeah, once it happens interesting times are on the horizon