• MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, sort of. TIL this particular unit came from different definitions of hundredweight. Though, I’d argue this is still kinda of British origin (and the pound).

      My favourite unit to pick on when someone doesn’t want to switch to metric because it’s “European” and they’re proud Americans, is BTU.

      Why yes, how American, British Thermal Units haha

      Don’t be me started on tons of refrigeration 0_0 that’s nightmare fuel

    • Malgas@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      The long (British) and short (American) ton are both 20 hundredweights. The American hundredweight is exactly 100 pounds, while the British hundredweight is 112. You tell me which of those is more reasonable.

      That said, both units did, in fact, come from Britain. The old Imperial system often used the same name for different units depending on what was being measured and for what purpose. Both countries passed laws to simplify and consolidate these measurements in the early 19th century, but in many cases chose different versions to standardize on.

      • Obi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Isn’t it also because they would use the same units but undercut the American buyers or something? Same why a pint isn’t a pint?

        • Malgas@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The pints thing actually has the same cause as I was talking about above: The British standardized around the Elizabethan ale gallon, while America used the Queen Anne wine gallon.