• 21 Posts
  • 1.27K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle

  • Your country had better have a state owned grid, with a state run retailer, else this is still the same sort of shit, just without hidden fees.

    Sincerely, an annoyed Victorian/Australian that wishes their electricity was just managed by the state.

    There may be no hidden fees where I’m from, but when there’s a private company with a monopoly, what’s the difference?

    Capitalism/privatisation is such a scam

    :(






  • I think you’re missing my point. Megacorps taking advantage of browser features should be outlawed, and cookie banners to opt-out of tracking cookies are a weird waste of time.

    What that means for small hobbyist projects requiring the use of Cross-Site cookies is outside the scope of my opinion. I have no idea about how such things could be feasibly policed, just that I’m not convinced they couldn’t ever be.

    But if I’m deciding between the collective wellbeing of everyone’s privacy and a small hobbyist project needing to add an opt in? I’m picking the opt in, which I mean, obviously, if the person wants to use your features, an extra click isn’t too much to ask


  • I don’t see why you’d need to throw out that baby with this bathwater.

    My point is the same as yours. You ought not need to “reject” cookies for the purposes of tracking you for marketing, or other defined illegitimate purposes. It should just be illegal by default.

    And if you want to opt in for some specific feature, as you suggest, you could (as long as you still legislate you can’t bundle more tracking along with it).

    Things should just do what is says on the tin.

    In my opinion.


  • They cant maintain the costs of research & debelopment nor the hosting. So they have to paywall their site or close the doors

    The irony of posting this comment on Lemmy, which runs based on donations. It isn’t paywalled, and doesn’t require data mining to operate. As well as Wikipedia which is completely free, and wildly successful. Which again doesn’t need to violate your privacy to continue existing.

    Not to mention, not every website is making money off selling your data, and are instead selling goods or services. Which can continue to operate and make money just fine.

    The fact you think the economy would collapse because data miners would lose their jobs, is showing your bias.

    Nek minnit you’ll be telling me we ought not stop fighting needless wars whenever the US beckons us, because of all the poor weapons contractors losing work (massive hyperbole, but you get my point).

    People working in data mining have heaps of transferrable skills, they would be totally fine.

    The internet existed before enshitification, and it certainly could afterwards.

    Would you have to pay a little more to access certain things? Sure. But I find the argument that the internet would cease to function very unconvincing.












  • I finally found you, an engineer actually using π=3 (or 4 as you say), and not just people making fun of it.

    I am also an engineer, but I’m going to wager much more recently graduated (worked 3.5 years).

    Who hurt you?

    Like, I get it, in a world before calculators, but there’s a button on the calculator, in your spreadsheet, in whatever program that approximates pi to many, many, many digits.

    Putting in a design/safety margins into pi seems like a strange choice.

    Sincerely, an engineer looking for answers on this π=3 meme.

    Even if it’s back of the napkin first past approximation. You have a phone calculator. Please use it for our collective peace haha

    (All jibes in jest, I’m genuinely curious)