• deegeese
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Isn’t most of the weight with hydrogen coming from the high pressure tank and gas regulator?

      My impression is that the gas is light but whole system hydrogen is pretty heavy.

      edit: Did some more reading. Hydrogen is still competitive on a Wh/kg basis, but worse on a Wh/L basis. Larger tanks are harder to fit in passenger cars than batteries and hydrogen’s poor whole system efficiency has kept fuel prices high while lithium batteries and solar power keep getting cheaper.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        H2 to get weight of tank down and highest density can be liquified. This works best by far for aviation that refuels right before takeoff. Can work for commercial boats as well. Costs more energy to liquify than compress.

        • deegeese
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          This makes hydrogen even more expensive and pushes it further into niches which need maximum range at any cost.

          • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Renewable h2 can be cheaper than gasoline or kerosene. Even with liquifaction. Has to use behind the meter or wholesale renewables instead of fixed utility pricing with transmission costs.

            Planes typically spend 100x in fuel over lifetime compared to price of plane

            • deegeese
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Where are you finding this cheap renewable H2?

              Or is this a theoretical future development?

              • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Making h2 at less than $2/kg from renewables is achievable today. 300 bar at $2. Lh2 at $2.50.

                Sales prices are much higher because capacity is still low, and toyota bundles some free to its fcev customers, and sales volumes are low such that a high profit margin is required to pay for filling infrastructure.

                $2/kg is equivalent range in a fuel cell compared to 1$/gallon gasoline. That is much less than refinery sales prices of gasoline or diesel.

                Consumer prices have chicken vs egg problem.

              • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’m assuming the concept they’re thinking of goes something like: Using renewable energy like solar and wind to convert water (or some other source of H2) into liquid H2 for the increased energy density compared to charging lithium batteries or equivalent with those same renewables.

                There’d be tons of energy loss along the way, but since renewables are effectively “free energy,” I can see that it would work in theory.

                • deegeese
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Right, hydrogen only makes economic sense if the fuel is free because the whole system efficiency stinks compared to BEVs.

                  • Maalus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    Well, my city operates busses on hydrogen. Must be worth it, otherwise they wouldn’t have done it. We also have a hydrogen fuel station.

                    Edit: for actual numbers - 100km - 6.9kg of hydrogen average usage - 387 PLN. For comparison - diesel - 168 PLN, but it just assumes fuel cost. They explain that filters, maintenance, oil etc isn’t factored in and is higher for diesel, where hydrogen is a lot less complicated and requires less consumables to operate.

                    For something that is just beginning to be introduced, versus diesel which was used since time immemorial, the cost isn’t that bad.

                    For range, they say 450km “full”, but one shouldn’t completely empty the fuel tank. It takes 25 mins to fuel a bus from zero to full. They’re silent as hell, don’t need huge electric infrastructure (since they refuel so quick). Long term they predict that fossil fuels will be more expensive, with hydrogen reducing in price. They also get funding from the country for it, since it is a “green” vehicle. Also, zero emissions obviously, but still brake dust and tire particulate

                    The biggest drawbacks is the current fuel price and the price of the vehicle itself.