schizoidman@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoHolding back China's chipmaking progress is a fool’s errand, says U.S. Commerce Secretary | Tom's Hardwarewww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1155arrow-down114file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mlhardware@lemmy.world
arrow-up1141arrow-down1external-linkHolding back China's chipmaking progress is a fool’s errand, says U.S. Commerce Secretary | Tom's Hardwarewww.tomshardware.comschizoidman@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square32fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mlhardware@lemmy.world
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoWhy fight globalization? It’s inefficient to make everything domestically, and as long as your supply chain is sufficiently diversified (including some domestic production), it’s not an issue. Keep the good jobs domestic, outsource the bad ones.
minus-squareGalapagon@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoYour end summary is really what I mean. With an educated population, you keep the good jobs and let the rest of the world handle everything else
Why fight globalization? It’s inefficient to make everything domestically, and as long as your supply chain is sufficiently diversified (including some domestic production), it’s not an issue.
Keep the good jobs domestic, outsource the bad ones.
Your end summary is really what I mean. With an educated population, you keep the good jobs and let the rest of the world handle everything else