• yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Plenty of guys over there agree that the Hog is a modern Stuka. They’re both impressive, have intimidating reputations, make a scary sound, and too vulnerable to operate without air supremacy.

      And the Air Force agrees. In Desert Storm, the A10s had to hunt SCUDS in the desert because they were getting murdered by Iraqi anti-air.

      • supersquirrel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I mean, I could see the A-10 being useful in a near-peer conflict unmanned piloted by a remote drone operator in a swarm of covering/scout drones with purposefully worse radar/heat signatures.

        The remote drone operator could fly the A-10 employing a nuanced strategy of “Fuck As Much Shit Up As I Can In The Shortest Amount Of Time Until I Get Blown Up” (not gonna write that acronym out, but trust me it is in plenty of DOD whitepapers) military strategy developed by Henry Kissinger during his time at the Rand Corporation. The idea wouldn’t really be to take too many airframes home, but if it is WW3 than I mean who is worrying about retirement!

        • supersquirrel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          … I feel like you could take out a an A-10 with just shoulder launched AA missiles? I would much prefer to be a helicopter in a high threat environment than an A-10 since you can more easily hide behind terrain as cover. I mean really, the difference between life an death is going to be the couple degrees of cover given by a ridge you get from hovering as absolutely close as you can to the ground as you get ready to launch a TOW… you don’t want to be an airplane in that kind of environment unless you are really fucking fast.