Summary

Euthanasia accounted for 4.7% of deaths in Canada in 2023, with 15,300 people opting for assisted dying—a 16% increase, though slower than prior years.

Most recipients had terminal illnesses, primarily cancer, and 96% were white, sparking questions about disparities.

Quebec, at 37% of cases, remains Canada’s euthanasia hotspot.

Since legalizing assisted dying in 2016, Canada has expanded access, now covering chronic conditions and planning to include mental illnesses by 2027.

Critics, citing rapid growth and controversial cases, warn of insufficient safeguards, while proponents highlight strict eligibility criteria. Debate continues globally.

    • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      10 days ago

      There’s a huge push from the right that this is unethical to offer it in the first place and that soon we are just going to let people euthanize themselves instead of “treating” them. I mean, i don’t want people to do this either, but who are we to force a choice onto someone?

      • podperson@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yep - “unethical” to let people die without suffering and passing on financial ruin to loved ones, but “ethical” to kill criminals for their misdeeds. That’s superb logic from the right.

        • moistclump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          I don’t disagree with you, but I think you’re thinking US not Canada. Death penalty is not Canadian. I don’t think? And health cares free (not to say there’s not other costs associated).

          • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            We haven’t had the death penalty for decades. We stopped using it in '63 and officially abolished in '76 for civilians and '99 for things like treason.

      • ramsorge@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 days ago

        They love to control you. And if people had a super easy way to check out, they would lose a lot of their workforce.

        • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 days ago

          I think that there needs to be better mental health services, and that doesn’t just mean throw pills their way and be done. We need to help these people, and if they find that nothing else will stop them from wanting to move on, then let them do it peacefully, instead of the more gruesome methods

          • ramsorge@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            That’s nice to have as an option, but it shouldn’t be a requirement to go through therapy first. The problem is the world is shitty. If people don’t want other people pushing the power button, make the world not shitty. Let’s not always put the burden on the victim to simply learn to accept life.

            I think everyone has the right to say, “this is what I want from life. If I cannot have that, then I’m not interested in life.”

            • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              Right, I was just trying to say we should have that option of support where therapy might be beneficial and avoid them passing away. I really don’t want someone to suffer in this world being alive, but If I was the person talking to them I’d like to offer helping them, and real help.

              • ramsorge@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 days ago

                Well, that’s nice of you. But the world is a cruel place to a lot of people, and I think a good chunk of them would power off today if they could.

                • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  yes, and back to the main topic MAID should be offered to those who would instead use a more gruesome method…my uncle did that and it shattered our family

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      One step at the time.

      Making euthanasia legal for people with terminal illness is already hard enough and I’m glad it is now possible in a lot of countries.

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      There were issues early on and people who shouldn’t have been offered the option, got offered the option.

      • ramsorge@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        I mean, anyone who wants the option should have the option. The requirement should be to make an appointment.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 days ago

          No argument against that.

          The problem was (as I understand it) the doctor didn’t read the room and it was received poorly.