• Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    […] anonymous sourcing and source protection still has a place […]

    I agree. Though, anecdotally, I’m not exactly fond of how some news outlets that I’ve come across use such types of sources — they use some adulterated quote snipped buried within their article; I think it would be better if they, for example, post explicitly the entire unadulterated (within good reason) transcript of the anonymous source with all relevant metadata cited along with it, and then cite that in whatever article.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah, it’s a problematic tool, for sure. In politics in particular it can be used to present interested or partisan information as factual or to manufacture a story. Happens all the time.

      That’s why loopholes are loopholes and controlling misinformation is so hard. Perfectly legitimate tools can be used maliciously or unethically and there are very valuable babies in that bathwater that shouldn’t be sacrificed in pursuit of easy solutions.