• Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Or maybe we require large newspapers and other single owner/large audience influencers to cite sources if they make claims and make them liable if it turns out to be false… […]

    Well, defamation laws do exist [1]. Other than things like that, I think one should be very careful with such times of laws as, imo, they begin encroaching rather rapidly on freedom of speech.

    References
    1. “Defamation”. Wikipedia. Published: 2024-12-09T15:41Z. Accessed: 2024-12-11T07:02Z. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation#Laws_by_jurisdiction.
      • §“Laws by jurisdiction”.
    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Defamation is very far away from our current situation. Europe is on the correct path imo in holding those who profit from disinformation accountable.

      There should be no right to abuse others verbally or spread disinformation. Of course you can always use this in bad faith as a government but that is what we have assasins for.

      • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        […] Europe is on the correct path imo in holding those who profit from disinformation accountable. […]

        I’m unfamiliar with those specific laws. Could you cite what your referring to for my reference?

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That is correct. It neither needs to be nor is a society that allows abuse of power „civil“.

          This new development showed that the ever going „we win, you lose, and you‘ll be happy about it“ does in fact have an antidote, although a horrific and regrettable one.

          • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            […] the ever going „we win, you lose, and you‘ll be happy about it“ does in fact have an antidote […]

            I would argue that the antidote is compassion.

            • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              In theory, yes. But thats not how social systems work. If you build a selfsustaining cycle of abuse held in place by dopamine inducing mechanics like easy to consume media you can manipulate people to do whatever you like, see the current shift to fascism. Nobody with a hint of compassion would vote for a fascist, hell nobody with an ounce of self interest would do that but here we are. Its like asking drug addicts to just not use the stuff. Not how humans work.

      • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Defamation is very far away from our current situation. […]

        How so? Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant by “make them liable if it turns out to be false” — I think it’s possible that defamation wouldn’t account for all possibilities, but I think it’s at least one thing that is covered by what you are talking about.

      • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        […] There should be no right to abuse others verbally or spread disinformation. Of course you can always use this in bad faith as a government […]

        For clarity, are you referring to the government abusing the judicial system to silence someone with opinions they don’t like?

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Among other potential abuses, yes.

          People and companies have abused the judicial system as long as it has been in place. We havent (and shouldnt) dismantle it just because it can be abused.

          • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            […] We havent (and shouldnt) dismantle it just because it can be abused.

            I hesitantly agree, though I would clarify that I don’t think that’s an argument for not improving the justice system.