• GoodEye8@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    And? If they sell at the same price as Steam but with the store taking a smaller cut they’ll make more money per sale.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      A lower price may attract more buyers, leading to more money overall (rather than only seeking to maximize each individual sale)

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        And which platform has the most potential buyers, by a long shot? Steam. That’s why you’re usually seeing all time lows on the Steam platform, because the sheer amount of buyers outweighs the per sale loss.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          If a dev wants to make X per game, they could get X with a lower price point on Epic. To still get X, they could sell the game for a lower price on Epic. That lower price may get some people to buy the game who wouldn’t buy it for anything more.

          The game can still be sold on both Steam and Epic, which is the whole point of this discussion, so Steam having a larger userbase is irrelevant.

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            If the userbase is irrelevant then X per game is also irrelevant. X per game matters only in the context of how many sales you’ll make. There’s a strong correlation between sales and userbase because more users means more potential sales.