• SlippiHUD@lemmy.worldEnglish
    6·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve consistently been a 800-1100 level player since I first learned to play the game in 4th grade. Noone in my family cared about being good at chess, and as an adult I had other games I rather get good at.

    And as a result I mostly play 800 elo and below family members and I’m happy to lose to any friends who are better. The amount of study and months of practice to catch up is unappealing, I just call them a giant fucking nerd and we go play melee.

    But a 500 v 500 elo chessgame is mind boggling to me, they appear to have a tenious grip on the rules, and a fractured understanding of cause and effect.

    • Evolith@lemmy.world
      2·
      3 hours ago

      I was chess club president for several years back in my high school. Now, as a 500-rated player and lifelong Mario Party connoisseur, I can guarantee you that both games feel like RNG even if I put the neurons to use.

      • SlippiHUD@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        3 hours ago

        I recognize your truth.

        I just can’t comprehend it. Even Mario Party has strategies to manipulate the RNG in your favor.

        Bonus stars come from a set of categories, and it picks so many at random to award. But you can play to win as many categories as possible to maximize your chance at bonus stars.

        The dice rolls are solvable, to minimize your chance of getting bad spaces. Sure you can’t always avoid a bad space, but if space x ahead of you is bad, and you have dice that can’t roll that number, pick those dice. Or if all your dice can roll that number, pick the one least likely to do so.

  • webghost0101
    13·
    8 hours ago

    If you play it loose during the opening and make some light blunders your opponent will overestimate their superiority and more likely blunder in the late game.

    I am joking but also i am not. My lichess data confimed it.