BadmanDan@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 20 hours agoKamala Harris won politicaly engaged voters, but lost voters who don't follow politics.www.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square81fedilinkarrow-up1276arrow-down115
arrow-up1261arrow-down1external-linkKamala Harris won politicaly engaged voters, but lost voters who don't follow politics.www.nbcnews.comBadmanDan@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 20 hours agomessage-square81fedilink
minus-squareEmpireInDecay@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·16 hours agoWhy is the default argument from liberals always ‘but Trump?’ Harris would have been a shit candidate not worthy of being elected regardless of who her opponent was.
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-214 hours agoThat doesn’t matter. She was the only other option we had
minus-squareFreefall@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·14 hours agoBecause she wouldn’t have been shit. Your argument is invalid.
Why is the default argument from liberals always ‘but Trump?’ Harris would have been a shit candidate not worthy of being elected regardless of who her opponent was.
That doesn’t matter. She was the only other option we had
Because she wouldn’t have been shit. Your argument is invalid.