Summary

Donald Trump’s decisive victory in the 2024 election leaves no room for ambiguity or an “asterisk” in his legitimacy, as he won both the popular vote and the Electoral College.

This outcome represents a clear mandate from American voters, who knowingly chose Trump’s policies and approach.

The anticipated results include pardons for January 6 participants, attacks on the press, and an administration filled with controversial figures.

By voting for Trump, Americans prioritized divisive rhetoric over democratic values, accepting the resulting turmoil.

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago
    • She absolutely crushed Trump at the debate
    • Her rallies were drawing far more people than Trump’s
    • She had A-list star power (Beyonce, Julia Roberts, Taylor Swift, etc.) actively endorsing her
    • She took over a race where Biden was down by 5%+ and losing ground daily to at least making it competitive
    • She only had 107 days to work with.

    It proved to not be enough. The people who were coming to her rallies were apparently all people who were going to vote for her anyway; the size of the rallies only gave the illusion that her campaign was attracting more voters. And with so many Democrats actively choosing to stay home rather than vote at all, it seems like nothing she did would have mattered anyway. But given the crap she had to work with, she ran a near-flawless campaign. She had no way of knowing that it just didn’t matter.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      There’s still a lot of analysis still to be done, but the Pod Save America guys pointed out that the Harris campaign saw less slippage in states where they were actively competing on the ground than in solidly red states where they didn’t fight as hard. This indicates that the campaign did make a positive difference, just not enough to overcome the negatives.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      You listed things they tried, but didn’t work

      The entire point of a campaign is to attract voters…

      Literally the only metric that matters for how good a campaign was, is how many votes they got.

      And Kamala drastically underperformed.

      So her campaign wasn’t “magnificent” it was a spectacular disaster that couldn’t beat trump with everything you listed and a billion dollars

      • Moneo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yup. If she ran a magnificent campaign she would have won.

        I was arguing with my buddy about this last night. He kept saying that she had to pivot right to have any chance of winning the election. Me pointing out that she performed terribly in the election didn’t matter to him. In his eyes shes did everything right and the voters are to blame I guess?

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          He kept saying that she had to pivot right to have any chance of winning the election.

          They can never give any logic behind it, and they’ll never learn it doesn’t work.

          But moderates will repeat that line as often as Charlie Brown will attempt a field goal, with the same results over and over again.