• ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    The campaign has been changing its tone depending on audience. In places like Michigan they’re doing this, but outside seing districts they’ve been banging the war drums for Israel.

    So the lack of faith in the messaging isn’t without warrant.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The campaign has been changing its tone depending on audience.

      Yes, it’s this shady practice called, “campaigning”.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        No disagreement that the campaign is, in fact, doing the campaigning thing.

        A good campaign presents their intended policies consistently and favorably. It sells the electorate on casting their vote.

        A poor campaign favorably presents inconsistent policies in a vague manner. It erodes faith in what the electorate is voting for.

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes specifically when they think her ads in different states with different messaging are not going to be shown around.

      https://www.foxnews.com/video/6364100748112

      She represent the regular two faced career politician, which should work in regular election, but the Israel genocidal work in Gaza and war crimes expose these politician.

      • Breezy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        You linked to faux news. So i will not click the link nor does anything that you said have any meaning.

        • Doorbook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is just a stupid take because almost all news agency are own by someone trying to push different agenda.

          • Breezy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes okay a biased “news agency” would be fine. But faux news is just that, fake news.

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            No other “news agency” had to legally argue in court that they are an entertainment-only product and no reasonable person would take their “reporting” as fact. Like a broken watch, they might sometimes be correct, but they are literally propaganda.