Summary

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes announced her office is examining whether Donald Trump’s recent remarks about former GOP Rep. Liz Cheney, made during an event with Tucker Carlson, could qualify as a death threat under Arizona law. Trump suggested that Cheney might reconsider her “war hawk” stance if guns were “trained on her face," prompting Mayes to instruct her criminal division to investigate.

Vice President Kamala Harris condemned Trump’s rhetoric, calling it “disqualifying” and warning of his “increasingly unstable and unhinged” behavior.

  • unemployedclaquer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Liz Cheney had an insanely high percentage of voting with Trump on legislation. Like 95%+. Way way higher than Elise Stefanik, who took her place in house leadership, because Stefanik was loyal on election denial.

    It is insane that anyone is fighting over Cheney vs Trump. None of them are good for America.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    You don’t actually think this will finally be the time he suffers actual legal consequences, do you? He’s the greasiest mf in America.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    The actual transcript:

    But [Dick Cheney’s] daughter is a very dumb individual, very dumb. She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. OK, let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face, you know, they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh, gee. Well, let’s send, let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy, but she’s a stupid person. And I used to have, I have meetings with a lot of people, and she always wanted to go to war with people.

    I’m no fan of Trump but this is unambiguously not a threat. The clear meaning is that she would would change her mind if she was one of the soldiers who would be fighting a war that she supports, not that Trump would threaten her with a gun until she changed her mind.

    • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      Its sure as hell is a stupid threatening way to put it.

      He could have said something far more professional like, I don’t know:

      “She constantly wants to go to war but she doesn’t understand what that is really like. Put her in the boots of a soldier and see how she holds up and maybe she would have some empathy.”

      Fuck Trump, he can’t even speak like an adult or form a proper statement. There are so many ways this could have been executed in a professional manner. It is a threat regardless of you and the 25+ upvotes. The projection here is this is how a from of punishment for this kind of thing is seen in his world view.

      By the way, he also knows jack shit about being in a war or being a soldier. Why don’t we also put him in a military uniform and put him on the frontlines. This is fucking Trump just being fucking Trump.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m too exhausted with this asshole to make a joke about bone spurs.

      Can Netflix or whoever cancel America already? It’s getting too fucking repetitive.

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure that, if he were to do such a thing, Kamala Harris would be just one of many people fighting back. And, yeah, with a gun.

    • Enoril@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Did you imagine what could be the country with JD Vance as president if Trump die of old (or fat) age?

      I find this even more disturbing than Trump being president.

      • unemployedclaquer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        That is precisely the plan. Vance is a comparatively stable predictable tool. No way he can win re-election on his own, but that won’t be necessary after he has a year or two in the white house.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yes, but this election will determine whether he dies while on the White house toilet or a prison toilet.