Now if only they could more clearly communicate when games are playable offline.

  • kevindqc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Because there are kernel-level cheats

    What you proposed can very easily be bypassed without even needing kernel access by just editing the executable code that checks hashes to always return true

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Boo freaking hoo.

      It’s not like there are so many other ways to cheat, actually used in many games with anticheats.

      We should all stop pretending it’s necessary to put malware into your computer just so some company can claim they have no cheaters, which is never even true.

      • xep@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The point of anti-cheat is to create a substantial barrier for cheating. If you have to go the extra mile to run an external hardware cheat so as to be “undetected” then surely this means the anti-cheat is working. If it were as ineffective as you imply, cheaters would be cheating on their main accounts.