• .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    The former first daughter

    Is this really a thing? I know about “First Lady” and I think that’s fine, but “first daughter”? That’s kinda whack.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s a commonly used term. The President’s family is the First Family. All children are the First Son/First Daughter even if there are several siblings. “First Lady” isn’t an official term; it’s not mentioned in the Constitution as an actual position but traditionally it is a thing.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        The first time I heard this term, I was so confused both as a young kid and as a child of immigrants (at that time, English was not my first language).

        I couldn’t understand why they were first and then when another president came in they were first again.

        • tehevilone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          “First Grandchild” has been used previously (mostly tabloids), but I think the “first” term is usually limited to immediate family

            • tehevilone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              By definition? No.

              But if there was a situation like that, I’m willing to bet people would default to using the “first” title anyway out of custom.

        • thefartographer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Nope, First Grandchild (or possibly just ignored). “Second” is for the VP.

          Doug Emhoff is currently the “Second Gentleman”

            • thefartographer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Eh, I feel worse knowing how easily accessible that knowledge was for me. I’m sure your brain was temporarily occupied by useful knowledge

              • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                I just lack information recall, and prefer interaction via asking humans over a search. It’s definitely something I knew, hence the duh.

                • thefartographer@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I was alluding to recall vs. implicit memory, but yeah. I wasn’t suggesting that you didn’t know the fact, I’m suggesting that perhaps your mind is less filled with the noise of factoids shouting themselves out at you.

                  I hope I’m correct in this assumption. Everyone deserves to be able to sit in personal silence.

                  • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Oh my misunderstanding sorry if it came across with any sort of tone. You’re not wrong in that at all, always some kind of chaos.