Title text: There are probably children out there holding down spacebar to stay warm in the winter! YOUR UPDATE MURDERS CHILDREN.


Transcript

[Changelog for version 10.17 of a piece of software.]

One change listed: “The CPU no longer overheats when you hold down the spacebar”
Comments: LongtimeUser4 writes: This update broke my workflow! My control key is hard to reach, so I hold spacebar instead, and I configured Emacs to interpret a rapid temperature rise as “control”.
Admin writes: That’s horrifying.
LongtimeUser4 writes: Look, my setup works for me. Just add an option to reenable spacebar heating.

Every change breaks someone’s workflow.


  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Counterpoint: devs frequently downplay user’s needs and inflate the importance of their own ideas, and because they’re often in an echo chamber of their own team’s environment, they never hear meaningful kickback from anyone they respect (because they certainly don’t respect users).

    Then they share this comic back forth literally every time users complain.

    Someone, in the slack channels of reddit’s devs, shared this exact comic with this exact attitude because of the backlash. And it was met with the same approval as the comments here.

    • Ape550@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is it exactly. Was a product manager and this is exactly the issue I faced with devs that had no real world usage experience.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I met a user for a tool I built at work. It was the worst.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wh have met with the users who use our product. But they don’t seem very able to articulate what it is they actually want or need from the system. It’s always vague ideas and nothing actionable.

      Them: Oh we need to be able to find customers even if they can’t remember their account number.
      Us: Yes but you can, just enter the company name.

      This is usually met with either a vague “yeah” or “no not like that”, and then they never elaborate.

    • newIdentity@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah. I’m pretty sure they’re mad too. They just can’t really do anything against it since it’s not their decision

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds awfully familiar. One of our customer wanted a very specific option our system does not provide - because it makes no sense at all. But instead that the customer discusses what is good and what is not, based on our >40 years of international experience in the field, we just got a bunch of drawings telling me that I should do something in the way a political committee with no professional input had decided.

    Customer pays for it, customer gets it. Fun fact: I know they will get sick of what they cooked up in no time, so I already installed a “kill switch”. As soon as they get sick of their stupid idea, I can reverse it with a single option. Bossman says to take the same amount of money for switching it back, and he knows they will pay.

  • malloc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like a future forever paid customer to me. Want overheating back? Pay $4.99 per month in perpetuity and ongoing maintenance costs lol.

      • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Aren’t there situations where you can’t crack something? Constant requests to home server and stuff.

        • __dev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Anything running on your computer can be cracked; that’s simply the nature of being in control of your device. (Web) Apps where the important stuff runs on a server can’t be cracked because there isn’t any DRM in the first place.

        • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          As personal, individual user, who gives a shit? I’ll just wait until a large enough gap between my version and the current version is there to warrent getting a more updated cracked version

          I used an outdated version of photoshop for years.

          If you NEED regular maintenance builds, it’s probably for enterprise, in which case you open yourself up to a whole lot of legal bullshit by making money using pirated software in the first place.

  • xkforce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Minecraft players when an update changes something thats been a certain way from the beginning.

  • tal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Emacs itself is actually impressively good at not breaking workflows, given how configurable the package is.

    • Skye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Other software: Don’t like this change? Go fork yourself.

      Open Source software: Don’t like this change? Go fork it yourself.

      Emacs: What do you mean you don’t like this change? You wrote the Elisp for the package yourself.

  • XEAL@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    And this is why I don’t update my installed Python modules fequently…