• paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Yeah, because that worked out so well when in 2016 when Trump got elected, the GOP got multiple Supreme Court picks, multiple federal judges were given life terms, and Roe vs Wade got struck down. Let’s see how that plays out when Ukraine falls, war breaks out in Europe, America becomes a theocratic dictatorship, and what little progress we may have seen with the environment completely falls apart and the world goes full tilt towards becoming an uninhabitable hellscape. Whatever the protest was about will be utterly meaningless.

    If you want to protest, you protest AFTER you get sympathetic ears into office, not after you get the opposition elected. Trump gets in, then suddenly he’ll give you plenty to protest about, vs protesting when Harris is in office and she actually has a willingness to listen to protests and meet their demands.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      If you want to protest, you protest AFTER you get sympathetic ears into office,

      This is exactly why the railroad strike failed lmao.

      Even UAW’s future strike plan is May 1, 2028, which is strategically a presidential election year, 5 months before the election.

      • chaonaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        The UAW struck after the railroad strike. And got Biden to personally come down to ask the what he could do to secure their vote. Both happened while Biden was in office. What are you even saying about why the railroad strike failed?

    • basmati@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      At no point has a protest pushed any president left, regardless of party.