• Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If those creatures that also eat mosquitoes cannot eat them anymore, that means they would have to eat other bugs more frequently, and possibly fucking up all the ecosystem.

    That said, fuck mosquitoes, they can take blood from other places.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      2 months ago

      All of our best data on the impact says that it really wouldn’t matter. Sometimes a species is a linchpin for the ecosystem, and sometimes it isn’t.

      Sucks for mosquitoes, but there’s a very real chance that we’ll smallpox them, and the biggest concern will be our confidence that the virus we use doesn’t impact other species unintentionally.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        Haven’t read closely on it, but I’ve seen plenty of articles about the lack of effect we’d see over killing off mosquitoes. I have a feeling that, along with what you said, it’s because they’re tiny.

        Consider the dragonfly. They hunt mosquitoes efficiently. But relative to their size, a mosquito is like us eating a candy bar, or even less. Meanwhile, they could snatch about anything else and it would be like a 3-pound steak.

        • Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Now that you say that, average us candy bar contains 200…250 kcal a piece. That’s about 1/7th of BMR of an average healthy male.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re largely applying this technique to invasive species of mosquitoes, eg Aedes aegypti, which is a potent vector of disease and native of Africa that has spread worldwide only within the past 200 years

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      They also eat nectar and are pollinators of various plants.

      There’s no way we could simply remove a creature as numerous and widespread as mosquitoes without any consequences.

    • Dabundis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      If we were to somehow magically remove mosquitos from existence in an instant, we’d better hope something fills their ecological niche quickly

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nothing eats them exclusively, that I know of. And they’re tiny. Any insectivore is getting far more nutrition out of about anything else.

        Maybe I’m wrong, but biologists seem to think eradication is a non-issue.

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think the purpose of the original genetic modification is to make them unable to bite humans (and spread malaria) but to otherwise leave them capable of feeding, thus not wiping them out and upsetting the ecosystem they’re part of

        • Dabundis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          The niche being food for fish that share their ecosystem in larval stages, and birds/bats/frogs that share their ecosystem in their adult stage.