• Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is assuming that the dems are anything but Captialist lapdogs, and willing to do any of this. They will not I am sorry to tell you that

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      This is assuming that the dems are anything but Captialist lapdogs

      It assumes Dems are in the majority at a uniform distribution. As though an extra 10M Californians voting for Harris will bend the needle on a race in Ohio or North Carolina or Texas.

      Nevermind the “You get a supermajority and can pass anything you want!” is a scenario we already had in 2009. And what happened? Big bank bailouts. Lukewarm regulations. A bloated Pentagon churning out failed project after failed project to the tune of trillions. No DC statehood. No SCOTUS majority. No gun control. No immigration reform. No Single Payer. No Abortion enshrinement.

      Republicans only hold power because you let them hold power

      True! But only for the leadership of the party. When grassroot Dems turnout in droves, the senior leadership takes office on a platform of Bipartisanship and Cooperation. When grassroot Dems collapse in exhaustion and despair, suddenly you’ve got a Unitary Executive and a Simple Majority in the House and Senate and a SCOTUS that can tear up the Social Contract at its leisure all stacked in the favor of Republicans.

      What does happen if Harris wins big in November? Do Democrats get anything they were promised over the last 30 years? Or do we get a Democratic President more fixated on going to war with Iran and “balancing the budget” on the backs of SS/Medicare than offering an improved quality of life for American residents?

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They only held a supermajority in the Senate for 72 days. The Minnesota seat was disputed and another democrat died of a tumor. Plus, enshrinement was not important back then as RvW wasn’t considered to be in danger.

      • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        no matter what time it is going to be the second, agian the Democrats are not beholden to the people, they know who’s intrests they serve and they lerch farther to the right each election

      • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        1 what lemmy lemmy.ml lemmy.world lemm.ee lemmygrad please specify mr.McDroupout@lemmy.world I need you to be more specific

        Second Oh no your down vote hurt me so much how will I ever recover that someone on the internet disagreed with me.