• Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    My grandfather went through something similar. He faced relentless hate and pressure from both sides of the political spectrum, but he never caved and stayed true to his convictions.

    Just like those old-school Communists, he knew the power of standing firm, even when the world seemed against him.

    Choosing the “lesser of two evils” was never his style, and I’m the same way. I won’t be bullied into casting a vote I don’t believe in, and neither would he.

    In my opinion, respecting someone’s decision to vote their conscience is a lot more powerful than forcing them to pick the so-called “realistic” choice.

    I won’t be voting Harris. I’m proud to vote third party.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m sure you think you sound like you have integrity, but it sounds like privilege to me.

      Women have actually died because they couldn’t get abortions.

      I could point out a lot of other things that happened because of Trump, but let’s just deal with this one issue.

      And you totally misread the idea of the old school Communists standing firm.

      Another thing they talked about was Ho Chi Minh working with the American OSS in WW2. Ho would have known all about America’s history of racism and genocide, but that didn’t matter because there was a bigger threat to his people.

      And please name the ‘Third Party’ you’re planning on voting for. There’s proof that the GOP has helped both the Libertarians and the Greens get on the ballot to help split the Dem vote.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not bullying, it’s simple math. Harris wins or Trump wins. Harris isn’t perfect, but Trump is unacceptable. Voting for neither is a choice, but it’s choice that says you don’t care which one wins. You don’t care if a fascist bigot who wants to abuse his power to control women and line his pockets wins the election. Anyone that’s OK with that is either themselves a fascist bigot who wants Project 2025, or they’re stupid.

      So saying you don’t care if Trump wins tells me you might be a fascist bigot, or you might be stupid. If you’re just stupid, that’s fine, vote your conscience. But if you’re a fascist bigot pretending, you might as well admit it to the world and admit you’re supporting Trump.

      Either way, it’s not a persuasive argument to make anyone think you have anything of value to say.

      • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        💯

        Voting is always an act of harm reduction. Choosing to vote for a non-viable option or not vote is a statement that neither you nor those you care about (in life or the abstract) are in minimal risk of harm or you don’t care about the harm they may undergo.

        That’s either privilege or sociopathy.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          And honestly I suspect there is a lot of astroturf trying to make the argument. Far too many people on social media are using the same talking points, eg “I can’t support a genocide enabler.” Which is a valid issue, but it’s disingenuous to think that Trump is going to be better for Palestine. Harris, being a human being with empathy, would certainly want the violence to end. Trump wants the genocide to finish. He’s said that. A Jill Stein protest vote is nothing.

        • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          That’s either privilege or sociopathy.

          And the way your post is worded makes think that you may be coming from a place of either privilege or sociopathy.

          Just because someone disagree with you, doesn’t mean they have privilege or that they are sociopaths. Thank you!

      • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        tells me you might be a fascist bigot, or you might be stupid.

        And you trying to bully and pressure me, tells me the same things about yourself that you just accused me of. Either way, it’s not a persuasive argument to make anyone think you have anything of value to say.

        I’m still voting third party. And proudly. Thank you!

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wasn’t bullied into casting a vote for Hilldog (she fucking sucks). I am going to vote against the orange bad because I’ve seen how awful his time in office was. I’m not a fan of Harris, but I’m very anti-him. Dems aren’t good enough, but he’s terrible enough that I must do what I can to prevent another term.

      • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Third parties will never be viable if we keep dismissing them and refuse to vote for them, which only strengthens the duopoly’s stranglehold on our political system.

        • RedSeries@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          So your goal is to make them viable by giving them a pittance of a vote during an incredibly polarized election? How many local seats has your third party won? I wonder if they do anything or have any success outside of ~2 months directly before an election? Why didn’t I see shit like this year round from you losers?

          There are people affected by your lack of empathy and harm reduction. You stomp your feet and blame the system, and then make a net-zero or negative dent in it and call that integrity. You’re no better than the brainwashed right who would vote for a literal felon.

    • Matt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If/until the US installs a ranked choice voting system and dissolves the electoral college, third party candidates are not viable.

      • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Third parties will never be viable if we keep dismissing them and refuse to vote for them, which only strengthens the duopoly’s stranglehold on our political system.

    • Skeezix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you choose Harris over Trump, you are choosing the lesser of two evils. If you choose between Fruit and Stein, you are choosing the lessor of two weevils.