In San Francisco, under the in-law and illegal space legislation of 2016, tenants are granted the right to refuse an inspector onto the premises. So for the San Francisco area, residents are granted the right to refuse inspectors into the building.
This doesn’t prevent the inspectors from lodging a formal complaint, which SF has indicated that, that’s exactly what they’re going to do with Musk’s office. This would start throwing the whole thing into civil court which can lead to civil penalties. Which combined with Musk not paying rent in several locations and facing evictions and the associated fees with that, any penalties will just be added to the pile of money that he’s currently setting “ablaze”.
deleted by creator
In San Francisco, under the in-law and illegal space legislation of 2016, tenants are granted the right to refuse an inspector onto the premises. So for the San Francisco area, residents are granted the right to refuse inspectors into the building.
This doesn’t prevent the inspectors from lodging a formal complaint, which SF has indicated that, that’s exactly what they’re going to do with Musk’s office. This would start throwing the whole thing into civil court which can lead to civil penalties. Which combined with Musk not paying rent in several locations and facing evictions and the associated fees with that, any penalties will just be added to the pile of money that he’s currently setting “ablaze”.
San Fransisco is going to spend hundreds of millions in court fees trying to get a look at that sign.
It’s already been removed..
That’s good information, thanks for sharing
When you’re rich, they let you do it.