fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoWhat if?mander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1279arrow-down165
arrow-up1214arrow-down1external-linkWhat if?mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squareBjörn Tantau@swg-empire.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up118·2 months agoBasically all atomic models that would lead you to that conclusion are wrong.
minus-squarethe_beber@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41arrow-down4·2 months agoModels in general are wrong.
minus-squareI_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 months agoBut some are useful
minus-squareStaticFalconar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 month agoIncluding the one where the solar system is one big atom.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·edit-21 month agoI don’t think you understand their point. They’re saying that what if we exist at the scale of storms to us as some incomprehensibly larger beings’ universe.
Basically all atomic models that would lead you to that conclusion are wrong.
Models in general are wrong.
What’s this from?
Zoolander
But some are useful
Including the one where the solar system is one big atom.
I don’t think you understand their point. They’re saying that what if we exist at the scale of storms to us as some incomprehensibly larger beings’ universe.