• BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.

        They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.

        Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.

        • BluesF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Still wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.