The "improvised" decision multiplied Chinese exports to Italy, but failed to do the same for Italian exports, he said.

The decision to join the Silk Road multiplied China’s exports to Italy but did not have the same effect on Italian exports to China, Italian Defence Minister Guido Crosetto said. “The issue today is: how to walk back [from the BRI] without damaging relations [with Beijing], because it is true that China is a competitor, but it is also a partner,” Crosetto added. Italy signed up to the BRI under a previous government, becoming the only major Western country to have taken such a step.

  • interolivary@beehaw.orgEnglish
    5·
    1 year ago

    What an odd initiative if it’s all based on loans. What’s the incentive to take part in it, especially for poor countries like Laos for whom the debt might be a sizeable percentage of their GDP? I fail to see the “carrot” of foreign-built infrastructure if it comes with potentially completely unsustainable debt

    • sadreality@kbin.social
      9·
      1 year ago

      You are assuming people signing countries for these deals are good faith actors… They have been compromised aka paid off to take less than fair dea and tax layers/consumers end up paying the bill anywya.

      • interolivary@beehaw.orgEnglish
        4·
        1 year ago

        And you’re assuming they’re all bad faith actors. While some will most certainly have been, I doubt every single instance of countries signing on to the BRI was done in bad faith.

        • sadreality@kbin.social
          4·
          1 year ago

          Not every BRI deal is a bad deal tho either.

          China will screw you over but if a country is able to they can get a mutually beneficial deal. Italy should be one of such countries.