Professional game makers care very much about how Unity operates as a business these days.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 months ago

    No, why?

    Because at any second they can decide its not enough anymore and backcharge every single install.

    Fuck that.

  • soulsource@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am not in the position to decide which tech we use at the studio, however, as a Senior my voice is certainly heard when it comes to tech decisions.

    And for Unity I can only say: No tech is worth the risk of dealing with such a shady company.

      • soulsource@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh, that just happened. We didn’t have established processes for promotions for a very long time. The company was a tiny startup when I joined (quite literally in the cellar of the company founder’s place), with a really flat hierarchy and no distinction in seniority.

        At the point when the company started to set up a formal process for promotions, I had already been there for so long, that I was considered one of the most experienced people, and that’s how I ended up being filed under “senior coders” in the employee list basically since that category existed… It also was a bit weird, as that happened to coincide with all the COVID lockdown chaos, and I never had a formal promotion talk, just an email with an amandment to my contract, which I didn’t even read too carefully, so I didn’t realize at first that this was not just the yearly pay increase 😉.

        Oh, and believe me, the impostor syndrome is strong with me. I would not have promoted me to that role.

  • Linkyu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s a nope for me. Even with the recent changes, what they offer is less attractive than the competition, especially since their previous move gutted their one true edge, the asset store.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I played with Unity a bit and have a pretty fleshed out game idea. I can do the dev side on my own with placeholder assets when I finally have the time to sit down and do it, but there’s no way I’m doing Unity after the way they treated their customers. Same with Unreal because of my distaste for Epic.

  • @BrikoX Not me. Now that they have told the world that their terms of service only bind their customers and not Unity, how can they ever be trusted again? Every word that you agree to when licensing under Unity must be considered a lie; you’re really just agreeing to whatever they say at any point in the future, forever.

  • Psyhackological@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Never forget, every Unity demo we’ve seen has a ton of custom tools. For example, in “The Book of the Dead” they had all these custom tools, even some obscure AO tech for trees that didn’t work when I downloaded it. I remember complaining about it on their forums. Unlike Unreal, Unity’s never really “what you see is what you get”. Don’t get me wrong, I liked the short film, but Unity has always been like that, kind of “faking” the real capabilities of the engine. From an investor’s point of view, though, I guess it’s good marketing.

    Someone (@kratos_1335) in YouTube’s comments.

  • roger_smith@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Absolutely, it’s a flashy demo, but it’s hard to overlook Unity’s recent controversies. Trust takes a while to rebuild, especially when business practices are involved. On the other hand, if Unity 6 can really streamline workflows and deliver on performance, devs might give it another shot. Guess it’s a wait-and-see situation, right?