Like “does the Pope shit in the woods?” or “that train has sailed?”

Also, what good examples can you think of?

  • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Though this is not for idiomatic phrases, there’s also misnomer, for when something is named in a misleading or inappropriate manner.

    Though, different dictionaries seem to give different scope to what can and cannot be considered a misnomer, and others place different emphasis on precisely how the name is wrong qualifies it as a misnomer.

    Cambridge lists ‘dry cleaning’ as an example, a process that involves liquid and is thus antithetical.

    The focus is on something being named such that the obvious, plain reading of it implies the precise opposite.

    Merriam Webster lists that its a misnomer to call a farmer a peasant, which is not antithetical but more along the lines of being rude, out of date.

    Their conception of it is fairly broad: any name that is inaccurate for basically any reason, or even just a word that has offensive connotations due to inaccuracy.

    Dictionary.com uses the examples of Chinese Checkers, a funny bone, and hay fever.

    They focus the definition on the factual/historical inaccuracy of the term:

    Chinese Checkers did not originate in China, a funny bone is actually a nerve, not a bone, and hay fever is not caused by hay, nor is it a fever.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Cambridge lists ‘dry cleaning’ as an example, a process that involves liquid and is thus antithetical.

      Ehhh…man, I dunno about that example, Cambridge. Like, wouldn’t sweeping involve cleaning something? Vacuuming?

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          No, but if they’re going to assert that cleaning involves liquid, they would be counterexamples to such an assertion.

          • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            13 hours ago

            “dry cleaning” is a specific term for a method of laundering clothes that DOES require a liquid, but not soaking the clothes in water.

            Those things you mentioned are not counter examples, because they have nothing to do with “dry cleaning”.

            That’s like if I point out that peanuts aren’t actually nuts, and you respond with “but walnuts are nuts!”

            Yeah, walnuts are nuts, but that doesn’t have anything to do with peanuts and whether or not they are nuts.

          • SatyrSack@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            They are focusing on the dry part of the term. Using a liquid during the process goes against the dry part.

            • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I would tend to disagree with the Cambridge example, because liquids can be dry. “Dry” liquids are anhydrous, meaning they’ve been treated to remove any water.

              Source: Am chemist and I teach O-Chem, which frequently uses dry solvents, like anhydrous acetone.

              • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                But PERC, the chemical used in “dry cleaning” is NOT a dry liquid, so the existence of dry liquids is also not relevant to their example.

                I can’t figure out if the confusion is caused by unfamiliarity with the term dry cleaning, or just a feeble grasp of logic.

                • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  PERC

                  Perchloroethylene (aka tetrachloroethene) is a completely non-polar compound, so, yes, it is a dry liquid.

                  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    12 hours ago

                    Fair enough. My initial quick google research implied otherwise.

                    I’m not claiming to be an expert, although I’m not finding anything that uses the term dry liquid to refer to Tetrachloroethylene. Sounds to me like another misnomer. But, I won’t say you’re wrong.