• Fondots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    A roof only needs to be a thin piece of sheet metal, weighing somewhere in the neighborhood of 1-2lbs per square foot

    Most solar panels are going to weigh somewhere in the neighborhood of 2-4lbs per square foot. So is likely the panel would weigh 2-4 times as much as just a plain metal roof, plus possibly a metal roof under it and/or additional framing to attach the panels to, so power to weight does absolutely come into play.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      That comes in at an additional 400lbs on a vehicle that weighs 6,670 lbs if you assume the maximal weight of the panels and the need for a metal roof anyways. That extra 6% weight just doesn’t matter. 6% losses range for 12% free charging seems like a worthy tradeoff to me. (and again, this is the maximal value).

      • deegeese
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        That extra 6% weight just doesn’t matter.

        LOL weight is incredibly important. Automakers would kill puppies for a 6% weight reduction.

      • Fondots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        6% weight increase doesn’t necessarily mean a 6% efficiency loss, it’s not a simple linear relationship like that. Depending on the power of the motor and a few other factors that 6% weight increase could mean a huge hit to efficiency.