• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    We don’t really need any more debates. One was more than enough, and the election is two months away.

    • Jesusaurus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Under normal circumstances, the debates would help highlight each candidate’s approach to varying topics to help people better understand who they want to vote for.

      Trump’s intentional unwillingness to abide by the debate rule makes it little more than a middle school kids insult match.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        My main concern is if they have another one, Kamala might get cocky and say something that backfires and then the press will run with it like the Howard Dean scream. Quit while you’re ahead and don’t gamble away your lead. It’s not worth it.

          • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            Harris is the person that actually says the arguments to counter Trump’s lying ass that we’d think of on the way home from our own hypothetical 1-on-1 debate.