renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agoAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square134fedilinkarrow-up11.24Karrow-down120cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.22Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square134fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
minus-squareAeonFelis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 months agoXML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
minus-squarebss03@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoToo redundant, just use S-exprs. (Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
minus-squareDr. Bluefall@toast.ooolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoUnironically. Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.
XML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
Too redundant, just use S-exprs.
(Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
Unironically.
Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.