• Sneezycat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s also the fact that they’re completely optional and unnecessary. They provide nothing but cosmetics

    I hate this argument, because videogames themselves are completely optional and unnecessary. That’s the whole point of them, they’re just for entertainment, to have fun and enjoy playing them. So I don’t see how something being cosmetic makes any difference.

    It’s more like we didn’t like pay2win on online games, so they started making it “just cosmetic” in those, and somehow now people think it’s acceptable to have to pay for parts of a game they bought, in every game ever?

    Well, people waste their money on useless crap all the time, so I guess I’ll just be the cranky old lady and go back to playing my original AoM, where I’m actually playing a game and not an advertisement.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah i hate that argument too. Cosmetics used to be unlockable, not purchasable. We’ve took a massive step back and people just give it a pass. Not me though

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      where I’m actually playing a game and not an advertisement

      That’s more than a little bit hyperbolic.

      • Sneezycat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes it is but it’s a rant, of course I’m exaggerating a bit xP

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s more like we didn’t like pay2win on online games, so they started making it “just cosmetic” in those, and somehow now people think it’s acceptable to have to pay for parts of a game they bought, in every game ever?

      Warhammer: Total War really annoyed me on it’s DLC. Some the DLC factions were already in the base game. I would be paying to unlock factions that were part of the dev cycle.

      I could at least understand it, if the factions were released after the base game.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        See this, this I get. This is an actual reasonable problem. And we could be talking about it wrt Retold, since Freyr is a day one DLC.

        Personally I’m not too concerned with it because even if you ignore Freyr, the cost of Premium is $25 AUD more than standard, and it includes two future DLCs (which they’ve already said will be $15 USD, probably $20 AUD each). So Premium is worth getting just for the two future pantheons. And since Premium includes Freyr in addition to the future pantheons, it ends up not looking like an added cost in the way it would otherwise.

        But it still leaves a bitter taste in my mouth that there’s actual playable content not included for free that’s available day one. And it would leave me very angry if the prices had ended up such that the best deal for everything except the day-one DLC actually cost less than the best deal for everything including Freyr. But all this discussion about cosmetics. Not even interesting cosmetics like unit skins, but something that’s basically just profile pictures. Is annoyingly distracting from that conversation.