• ilega_dh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    There’s a lot of people who seem to have a knee-jerk reaction to this “that’s a war crime!!1!”, but it really is not. Incendiary weapons (like thermite, white phosphorus and napalm) are not illegal to use against legitimate military targets, including enemy combatants. It’s only a war crime when it’s used indiscriminately against civilians or in civilian areas.

    Lot of misinformation out there on this it seems.

      • deranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You can start a forest fire if said forest is used for cover or concealment by enemy military forces. All feasible precautions must be taken to limit the damage to military targets only.

    • jabathekek
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Lot of misinformation out there on this it seems.

      I wonder why? 🤔

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Honestly war crimes just have a lot of misinformation generally. Even in the military. There were people who thought we couldn’t shoot someone with a .50 cal machine gun. While this spawns funny jokes like aiming for their uniform buttons, it just isn’t true.

      • ilega_dh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Honestly, I think it’s more that people take this info from movies and just run with it than malicious (Russian) misinformation bots (although they don’t mind giving this an extra push I imagine).