Edit: so im done with my preliminary research into this codebase.

Our corporate SSO provider is changing, so I’ve been updating our tools to take advantage of the new badges. I found this in a web application that I started on today. The original developer is long gone, and according to our PaaS, this app has been running for just under 3 years without an update.

There is no CI/CD, blue-green deployment, or back ups. The database is an H2 db with ddl-auto set to create-drop on startup, meaning that this database will delete itself if the app is restaged but thanks to this guys code, it won’t populate itself. 🤷

  • Synthead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Good Lord, this makes my hands sweaty. Why is your entire prod database leaning on one line of code that’s prone to human error? There should be 20 extra accidental steps taken to do something like this.

    • sci@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      what do you mean? there’s 20 lines of comments warning about it!

    • devil_d0c@lemmy.world
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Turns out we were always one copy paste error from a major incident.

      Don’t worry, I’m fixing it 🤷

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Heh. That looks like it has decent odds of being a “company ending event” incident, to be specific.

        But at least there’s lots of comments. And maybe someone already put a safety net in somewhere else and just forgot to update the 20 comments. It could happen.

        • devil_d0c@lemmy.world
          cake
          OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Under different circumstances, sure. As it is, worst they could expect is a fine from our regulators for data retention hits. We could recreate the info easily enough if our suppliers played nicely.