• azimir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lay off Vance, everyone! The risk of actually showing how stupid and robotic this guy is is that he might get replaced on the VP candidate slot. He’s a terrible choice that’s driving people away, but if he gets replaced literally a bowl of soup would be a better choice.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nah I think a replacement does worse. Not because the replacement would be worse, but it shows insane weakness/ stupidity/ inability to have a coherent strategy on the part of a Trump campaign. It shows that these guys don’t know what it takes to win an election; and giving your vote to a team that doesn’t know how to win an election is a wasted vote. Its the same as why Biden was struggling; losing charges compound interest because viability is a key component of whether or not people vote for you. If you aren’t perceived as viable because of your polling, it bites double.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is my feeling as well. For Trump to replace Vance means Trump admitting he made a bad call. He makes horrible calls constantly, but I don’t see him admitting to a single one.

        • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 months ago

          He wouldn’t admit it. He would find something to blame on Vance (probably wouldn’t be a strain) and then “You’re Fired!” and the red hats would chuckle and never miss a beat.

          • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I wonder if Vance then makes the talk show circuit and turns anti-Trump while hyping his new tell-all book

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          It also kinda nukes all their bitching about replacing Biden.

          Biden was never officially nominated. Vance was. It’s a much bigger deal that shows weakness in the party.

    • Deadeyegai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      …so you’re suggesting some kind of “replacement theory”… Go on…those dumb dumbs would hate if the meaning of that phrase got flipped. lol

      • azimir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I had not considered the Mooch. That’s a great point.

        How long as Vance been on the ticket in Mooches?

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes, but RFK may or may not be. And at this point trump might put the wrong RFK on his ticket and get the brain worm guy instead of the dead politician.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You get into the role of electors, who are supposed to submit the votes for who best represents the state’s choice or something like that. This was written back when it would take weeks to get to DC, so who knows what would be there.