hydroptic to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 21 days ago"☹️".reverse() == "🙂"imagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1226arrow-down114cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up1212arrow-down1image"☹️".reverse() == "🙂"hydroptic to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 21 days agomessage-square29fedilinkcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up16·edit-221 days agoAlso, it should turn an error into an empty but successful call. /s
minus-squarehydropticOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·21 days agoCalling reverse() on a function should return its inverse
minus-squaretetris11@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·21 days agoisprime.reverse(True) // outputs 19 billion prime numbers. Checkmate, atheists.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·20 days agoIt’s a just a joke, but I feel like that actually says something pretty profound about duck typing, and how computable it actually is.
Also, it should turn an error into an empty but successful call. /s
Calling
reverse()on a function should return its inverseIt’s a just a joke, but I feel like that actually says something pretty profound about duck typing, and how computable it actually is.