The question about the legal and moral aspects of training on works of other artists is related, but a different discussion.

  • deegeese
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Art is human creativity. By its very definition, it cannot include something lacking originality.

    A person may use AI as a tool to create art, but without human creativity it’s just mechanical regurgitation.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Human is the one with vision, AI is the tool. It’s just a much more advanced paint brush that anyone can use. Alone it doesn’t create anything and if the end result is bad, it’s not the fault of the brush.

      AI art is just an art sub-genre like painting, sculpting or photography is. Saying it’s not art is like a film photographer saying digital is not real photography - gatekeeping.