What makes BSD stand out as its own system? I’ve been thinking about installing it in a new computer mainly for reading but I don’t know much about it.

  • Muddybulldog@mylemmy.win
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m going to get crucified for this… for a desktop end-user it’s basically Linux with completely different syntax, lesser hardware compatibility and limited support channels.

    • HousePanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am certainly not going to crucify you for it. While FreeBSD is a fantastic operating system, its hardware support is lacking.

      • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really wish it was more popular. The userspace feels way more cohesive and the GNUisms of some Linux utilities is annoying sometimes.

        • HousePanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I do as well but FreeBSD made a lot of self-inflicted wounds. OpenBSD on the other hand runs surprisingly well on a variety of hardware. It won’t run well on the absolute latest but one or two generations behind it works gangbusters.

          • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do you have recommendations for where to get started with OpenBSD? The only BSD distro(?) I have gotten working with my hardware (Thinkpad X1 gen9, M1 Mac) is Nomad.

            • HousePanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Simply get started using the OpenBSD FAQ. I think the Gen9 Thinkpad X1 should work. I just don’t know if it uses NVIDIA crap. If it does, you’re shit outta luck. As for the first generation Apple silicon, I don’t know how feature complete OpenBSD is on that platform.

        • PupBiru@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          that’s the catch though: it’s more cohesive because it’s not popular… people work and design and finesse it into a standard… linux however is popular so has a lot of opinions going into it! and that reinforces itself: it has a lot of stuff so that makes it popular and it’s popular so that means it has a lot of stuff!

          BSD is great for what it’s great for and Linux is good for… pretty much everything

        • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s actually amazing they got this much hardware support. Heck, they even have Nvidia driver support. It could’ve been worse.

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No that’s 100% the standard take. FreeBSD is a fantastic operating system but it doesn’t make sense as a daily driver for a personal computer

    • tauonite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And less supported software! Open-source programs can often be compiled for FreeBSD but many closed-source and some open-source software won’t work in FreeBSD. There is the Linuxulator, which is basically Wine but for Linux programs on FreeBSD but it doesn’t have perfect Linux software support yet.

      • Muddybulldog@mylemmy.win
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s rock solid. It also has a heavy emphasis on security. Numerous high-end network routers and security devices use it as the base operating system. Darwin, the open source foundation of macOS is also derived from it.

  • const_void@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s great for certain use-cases that don’t require a lot of hardware support. But don’t go trying to use it on your laptop.

  • ask@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like using FreeBSD, the setup feels a lot nicer and more coherent than Linux in a lot of ways. I mainly tried it for native zfs.

    The only downside is that nobody knows it exists so I have to compile things myself a lot or even patch it to get it to compile.

  • nhoad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use FreeBSD for my website and I’m actually pretty happy with it, the simplicity is a strong selling point.

    It does feel sometimes like the documentation is written with a lot of assumed knowledge though, which makes it difficult to know what terms to use to find what you’re looking for… e.g. figuring out how to do major version upgrades did not feel straightforward.

    • obbeel@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It will certainly deepen my knowledge about operating systems. Messing with alternatives to grub and all that.

      • dot20@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure about the BSDs, but for Linux you don’t actually need GRUB anymore these days. On modern (i.e. UEFI) systems, you can boot the kernel directly as an EFI binary (this is known as EFISTUB booting).

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s so old and rigid. But it’s stable and worth consideration. I put it in a similar camp as Debian. That said, I haven’t used it in years so I don’t really know the current state of things.

    OpenBSD is my go to for super-security though.

  • sibloure@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish I could figure that out. I’ve tried FreeBSD on my laptop, but Bluetooth wouldn’t work, I couldn’t install Signal, and basic apps I use daily are not available on FreeBSD. I’m not sure who uses it or what they use it for.

    • PupBiru@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      afaik it’s still very good for things like DNS and a lot of different server stuff. its more minimal than linux, so has a smaller attack surface and possibly slightly better performance?

      i don’t think its particularly useful for generic uses though… if you know you need it, you know you need it. if you don’t need it, you’d be better off with an OS that performs all the things you want it to adequately

  • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its a base layer of several other, really good operating systems but I wouldnt use it by itself. If you want something lightweight just install ubuntu or mint.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ubuntu and Mint are relatively heavyweight Linux distros, but still much lighter than Windows.

  • olizet@lemmy.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Linux on my selfhosted system with email and DNS, FreeBSD on my 2nd system. 2ndary DNS and hot standby for emails. Best of both worlds. You may hack the primary, but not both.