• MentalEdgeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    No they wouldn’t.

    • I don’t typically browse lemmy in a way where someone could see over my shoulder. (using thumbnail modes where I have to very deliberately go fullscreen for any images, I do this because I can’t block actual porn as a bunch of the content I do want to see would go with it)
    • This isn’t unusual. I’ve used this very image, and even more arousing art, as my desktop and phone wallpapers. My city has public art installations featuring both male and female nudity.

    I WANT to be able to tag content accordingly. Because I myself would like better control over my feed. Luckily Lemmy divides things into communities and instances. By subbing and blocking accordingly we can all very precisely curate our feeds.

    NSFW tagging has an literal implied use case, for which it is effectively useless. It isn’t how it is actually used, and is hence a wildly inaccurate way to exclude anything. Sensibilities vary, as to me this is less than what public art shows, and to you its porn.

    • colderr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, I get your point, but I would not like to argue with you anymore. It is your post and your choice and if you think that this post like this is correct, then it is correct.

      I hope you have a good day/evening MentalEdge and maybe we’ll communicate again (hopefully not argue).