• Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Agreed, but just saying “you can only have this much money” will get fought tooth and nail, IMO the way to do it is through basing the rates in tax brackets on the percentage of wealth controlled by people in those brackets.

    It’s not a “hard” cap, but it does pit the rich against each other to have more than the other rich assholes while not having so much that they’re all paying an above 100% tax rate.

    Might not be as delicious as frying them for ourselves, but watching the rich eat each other will be far more entertaining, and is shown to be far more effective. Take it from the once Shah of the Sasanian Empire Kavad, if any one noble is getting too powerful, the best tools to use in bringing them down is other nobles jealous of their ascendency.

    • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      But then we still live under the same corrupt system and nothing fundamentally changes except us offsetting our issues onto future generations. Continuing to find ways to prop up Capitalism and make it liveable doesn’t actually fix a ton, it just shifts the burden from us onto our children. That’s why we’re in the shit as much as we are globally right now, and our kids will be drowning in it if we don’t act.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I literally just made the owning class start a battle royale against each other and you want to argue nothing fundamentally changes? What are you worried it’s gonna be a .io game and we’re gonna end with a big fat superowner who ate everyone else?

        • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          thats just gonna create a different owning class and continue the cycle. change would be removing the idea of class altogether.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            How does it just create a different owning class if they’re all at war with eachother?

            You’re coming across as very "nothing but ‘just do revolution bro’ is real change!" right now ma dude.