On one hand, battery busses require lithium and rare earth metals which needs to be mined from a relatively short supply, as well as lots of fancy chemical processing which I’d wager produces plenty of byproducts, and batteries have a limited lifespan before needing to be replaced. On the other hand, trolley busses (the kind that gets power from overhead wires) require extensive infrastructure in the form of wires and poles, which require tons of metal (though much more abundant steel and aluminium) to produce and energy to install and maintain, and the wires also wear out from friction and also need to be replaced from time to time. Anyone know any papers comparing the sustainability of these two technologies? I’m also interested in how the wire-to-wheel energy efficiencies compare between them.

  • jelbana@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    There’s some discussion below on trolley buses, although Toronto specific. Seems like trolley buses have had a very short range battery for a while now, in case of emergency need to go off wire. Also, the issue of detachment appears to be more about operational maintenance, the below suggests that Vancouver has been good at minimizing wire detachments. Also, interesting to note that the average life-cycle of trolley buses is 20-24 years as opposed to diesel buses which is around 10-14. I’m not sure where ebuses would fit in, since we haven’t yet had enough testing of them yet.

    https://stevemunro.ca/2021/03/05/are-ebuses-the-answer-to-everything/