• Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Probably the same type of shit that cobol is. Some absolutely ancient system that they will never properly update because a 400k a year programmer is cheaper then doing so.

    • IMALlama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      If it was only one shitty ancient system it would be one thing. For the company I work for it’s about 10 big interconnected mainframe systems with hundreds of non-mainframe systems cobbled together around them. They’ve been in place since the 80s, but you can trace their business logic back to the 50s and 60s. They start at cataloging all our parts and get into purchasing components from suppliers, describing the products we assemble, managing the supply chains for our factories, order management from our customers, etc.

      Replacing it all will be massive chore, but it’s becoming more and more clear that we need to. At the end of the day, capturing and understanding data in them takes so much skill that we have entire departments dedicated to being an interface between the actual users and the mainframe. The business rules might have worked before the products we build contained electronic controls, but everything is starting to implode now that “parts” also includes software. This has resulted in manual workaround on top of manual workaround.