• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not exactly a proxy war when Russian troops are personally in Ukraine. That’s just a war.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The Korean War had over a million NATO troops and also tens of thousands of Soviet troops and, somehow, remained a proxy war. A particularly bloody one, but there was still no actual open full-scale warfare between NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Even China and America remained officially at peace, despite making up the majority of the forces on each side

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Apologies, I was using “NATO troops” as a shorthand for the large number of countries involved rather than the specific command structure. You are right to bring that up

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s not a proxy war between Russia and the US. It’s a proxy war between China and the US.

      Russia and Ukraine are the pawns

    • Mechanize@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Russia is actively in Syria from the end of 2015 as an official belligerent, it’s not something new for Russia to fight directly while others use only proxies.

      But I can see your point; still - officially - this is only a three days military operation. When that stance will finally change in the official channels, it will mean they can’t hold the mask anymore.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s a proxy war because the two major powers are fighting in an area neither of them own.

      Iraq was a proxy war, even though US troops were there.