• alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why make election season much longer than needed?

    Printing ballots can be done quite quickly.

    And is 6 months of campaigning really better than 2 months?

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well no, it’s better for the politician’s campaign’s wallets. If people could spend campaign funds however they wanted then Donald Trump would have quite a few less pending felonies.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Ffffuuuuuuucccckkk no its not better. It’s just that our system predated most parliaments, and as such the founding fathers made some stupid choices that made it utterly impossible to amend basic quailty of life changes for our democracy.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The process to amend the constitution. It’s all but impossible given modern politics, and that’s largely been true for 50 years and counting.

            • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Our election cycle cant be curtailed or shifted because our constitution can’t realistically be amended to match the saner policies in other countries. When our constitution is so antiqued that that “money is speech” becomes the law of the land, there is a core problem with the founding document itself.

              How it that not related to our election cycle?

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Because a constitutional convention is so wildly unlikely it’s just distracting from any actually helpful suggestions.

                • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  I’m talking about our broken government system, not what’s helpful. The fact that a constitutional convention is impossible is exactly the problem. Its why many parts of our democracy are broken, and will likely ultimately be the downfall of our nation.

                  Thr founders called the Constitution a living document, with Jefferson specifically talking about how it must change to as American changes. To do that, they put in a wildly difficult mechanism that is nearly impossible to actually invoke, and added lifetime arbiter roles that can opt to unwind any law not written in pen and ink on that same paper.

                  Those are critical fuckups if you intend to have a living document and a shapeable democracy.