When w11 announced that they were adding native support for rar, 7z, etc, it occurred to me that android also doesn’t support these and I found it really weird

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    People don’t tend to need to browse local archive formats on their phones I guess, and if they do, they’ll have a file manager app with support.

    There’s support for some formats if your files are in cloud storage like Google drive, which is a more likely use case for phone users

    • ByteMe@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m using a Samsung tablet that doesn’t support rar for example.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        I suppose you’d fall into my “you’d install a file manager app if you actually needed it” category

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I think a big part of it for RAR specifically is that it’s a proprietary format that would technically require Google to license it, and for the tiny percentage of users that would benefit, they don’t bother.

            A seemingly random but relevant example is the Japanese travel card situation with Pixel phones—every pixel on the planet has the necessary hardware to support Japanese travel cards since the pixel 6, however only pixel phones bought in Japan can use the feature (locked by the OS) because it would mean Google would have to pay a per-device cost worldwide.

            This is kinda a similar situation I’d bet, they’ve proven they would rather not include the feature than pay for licensing

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              I think a big part of it for RAR specifically is that it’s a proprietary format that would technically require Google to license it

              Unrar is free enough.

              • 9point6@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                And there’s not really any money to be made charging licenses to open source projects—see ffmpeg/vlc

                Google including it in android though means they can charge licenses as a per unit fee because, basically, Google (or phone manufacturers) is a company with money.

                • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Google including it in android though means they can charge licenses as a per unit fee because, basically, Google (or phone manufacturers) is a company with money.

                  What? This has literally nothing to do with unrar’s license terms.

                  • 9point6@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    We’re talking about Android, unrar doesn’t have anything to do with this really.

                    RAR is and will continue to be a proprietary format with an owner who can seek royalties.

                    It’s like saying Google should stop licensing MPEG because ffmpeg exists—it simply doesn’t work like that